Defendant Giuliani
WHO WARNED GIULIANI THE TOWERS WERE COMING DOWN??!!
Why did Giuliani leave 343 firemen BEHIND!!!
Please complete the Defendant Giuliani Poll
VIDEO: ONE HUNDRED PERCENT *WRONG*
Giuliani with Peter Jennings of ABC: "We were in a building in which we were trapped for about 15 minutes ... we set up headquarters at 75 Barclay street ... which was right there ... we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse in 10 or 15 minutes, and finally found an exit, got out, walked North, and took a lot of people with us."
Peter Jennings: "my question is ... [bleeped].
Let us surmise what Peter Jennings' question WOULD have been had he not been CUT COMPLETELY OFF at the very START of this question:
 | WHO told you this steel frame building was going to set a record and collapse from mere burning jet fuel? |
| HOW MANY did you NOT take with you? |
| WHO KNEW that the building would collapse IN PRECISELY 10-15 MINUTES? |
| WHY did you NOT remove the hundreds of firefighters that you KNEW were still there if you KNEW that the building was going to COLLAPSE? |
| WHO TOLD YOU THIS? |
| WHO WARNED you AND not THE OTHERS? |
CONTRAST THAT with his recent statement to "WeAreChange" where he DENIES knowing the buildings would collapse in 10-15 minutes, WHICH THEY DID, and claiming that he thought they wouldn't collapse for "7, 8, 9, 10 hour period", which is a PROVABLE LIE. Even THAT would be a ridiculous assumption, as no steel building has EVER collapsed from a fire:
Can we the people even begin to grasp the state of our justice system, wherein a "prosecutor" is allowed to LIE, violate NUMEROUS laws, DESTROY key forensic evidence, and then run for public office, again--the highest office of the land?
Is the following a picture of Giulianin warning the 343 firemen STILL in the building to evacuate it immediately?
NO! As the following two pictures show, THAT was a picture of Giuliani AND HIS STAFF running down the street to get AWAY from the building they were TOLD was going to collapse, LEAVING BEHIND THE 343 FIREMEN WHO DIED IN THE BUILDING COLLAPSE!!
CALL CAPTAIN SULLIVAN NOW!!
WHO TOLD GIULIANI THE BUILDINGS WERE GOING TO COLLAPSE??
<<<Someone
on this site should post the tel# of the bastards, who have arrested & imprisoned Matt
Lepacek. JOEY
I did post phone number yesterday either on this comment or other article about it on
Prison Planet! Here it is again: It is the Goffstown cops who arrested him SUPPOSEDLY NOT
State police although it sure LOOKS like State copper's hauling him off: Here's the number
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2007/060607criminalindictments.htm
1:30 pm
June 12, 2007
Captain Sullivan
He said that the
reporter who was arrested, Matt Lapecek, was
released “on his own recognize on $400 bail”, and "will have his day in
court”.
He said he was
not arrested for asking a question, but for “criminal trespassing”, because the
person [the name of whom he won’t disclose] who held the event asked him to leave and
he didn’t. I told him that the video
shows Matt with a legitimate press pass, that others with the exact same press pass were
NOT arrested and were NOT asked to leave, and that he DID leave when asked to. His argument that he was not arrested for asking
the question is a distinction without a difference.
I asked him if he
knew what the question was that he asked which caused them to ask him to leave, and he
said he didn’t, so I told him that the question was “who told Mayor Giuliani
that the building was going to collapse”.
He was silent for
a moment, then repeated “he was not asked to leave because he asked a question, and
he will have his day in court”.
I suggested to
him that those who arrested Matt for asking this question, should themselves be arrested,
and as they are in his jurisdiction, he’s the one who should arrest them.
Put the pressure on Captain Sullivan. Be polite, but firm. Let him know that the whole world is
watching, and the videos prove that Matt was guilty of NOTHING but asking a politically
incorrect question which has SERIOUS national security implications—AND PROVES
CRIMINAL ACTIVITY ON THE PART OF GIULIANI.
In response to Ron Paul's statement that "they attacked us because we've been over there--we've been bombing Iraq for ten years", "mayor" Guliani whiined:
"That's an extraordinary statement. that someone who lived through the attack of September 11th. That we invited the attack because we were attacking Iraq. I don't think I've ever heard that before, and I've heard some pretty absurd explanations for September eleventh. [canned applause] I would ask the Congressman to withdraw that comment and tell us that he didn't really mean that".
Was this a disingenuous attempt at character assassination, or is Guiliani really this uninformed and misinformed? Or was it just a cheap shot? Are we now going to place "Iraq bombing denial" in the same category as "holocaust denial"?
It is even POSSIBLE that anyone in this country could not be aware of this simple fact?
WHAT is Ron Paul going to "apologize" for--challenging the holy grail, like Marlon Brando when he groveled in front of the jews for claiming they run Hollywood, or Billy Graham when he groveled in front of the jews for agreeing with Nixon that they were over-represented in media?