Christian Party

 

Search

Forum

Donate

LAST Pope

Subscribe

jews/911

Damn MAD

Beerhouse

Blog

Feedback

dna

Bye RCC

AIDS

Home

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

TRAITORS

Health?

 

 

The IRS Is Illegal

 

bullet

The 16th Amendment was never ratified.

bullet

Politicians use this tax money to disobey their own electorate.

bullet

The IRS is contrary to the Christian principles of our Forefathers.

bullet

The majority of the $1.8 trillion federal budget is used to finance the destruction of the American family.

bullet

The IRS is a "voluntary tax".

bullet

The 16th Amendment is contrary to the Holy Bible.

bullet

Two thirds of those polled favor a repeal of the 19th Amendment.

bullet

MP3 Audio About Section 861.

bullet

IRS prohibited by I.R.C. � 7431 from disclosing confidential tax information.

 

 

 

Sent:  Monday, July 09, 2007  10:16 PM
Subject:  Transcript of Hauert

Hauert:  Willful failure

to file case dismissed

Hauert was indicted on five counts Sec.7203 WILLFUL
FAILURE etc.  Hauert wanted to know the OFFENSE statute
he was accused of violating and would then submit his plea.

Hauert wanted to know the particular statute that made him the
person required to pay the income tax.  His attorney
(addressing the judge) "The prosecution has been trying to get
my client to plea bargain.  My client is interested but has a few
demands of the prosecution in order to understand the charges
and determine the potential guilt.  He has a serious question that
nobody will address.  Will the court entertain that question?"

Judge: "Certainly."

Hauert:  "Your honor, Section 7203 of the I.R. Code is a
DIS-CIPLINARY STATUTE.  It defines the penalty for someone
who has broken the law. I need to know the underlying offense
statute that is used to determine if I am the "any person"
required to file.  The term "any person" is ambiguous.

Judge:  "I don't know what he is asking for."
(Looking at Prosecutor)  Do you know what he's asking for?"

Prosecutor:  "No, your honor, I don't know what he's asking
for either."

Judge:  "I am not knowledgeable of every law and can't be."
(Hey, isn't he presumed to to know the law?)

Hauert:  Could you please bring me the I.R. Code book with
7203 in it so I can show you what I am talking about. 
(Note: The clerk brought in the I.R.Code book.)

Judge:  (Reading Sec. 7203)   "Any person required under
this title to pay any estimated tax or tax, or required by this title
or by regulations made under authority thereof to make a return,
keep any records, or supply any information, who willfully fails
to pay such estimated tax or tax, make such return..."

Judge:  "Sounds clear to me."

Note:  (In the words of Hauert)  "I looked at the prosecuting
attorney and criminal investigator looking business-like and smiling
confidently and I thought, these suckers have gotten to the judge."

Hauert:  "May I see the book? (Reading) "....any person required
by this Title...What I am asking is, what statute establishes the
FACT that I am one of these "persons" required, by this title, to pay
the tax? Where, exactly, in the Title is the offense defined, where
am I made the subject of the tax?"

Note:  (In the words of Hauert: "I then handed the judge back the
book. Looking perplexed, the judge read those words over and
over again for what felt like an eternity.")

Judge:  "So what you're asking for, Mr. Hauert, is the Statute,
referred to in Section 7203, that makes a person liable for the
tax and subject to the penalties imposed by Section 7203?"

Hauert:  "Yes, that's what I have been asking the prosecutor
for.  I have also been asking the IRS the same question for
several years and no one will give me the Statute of law that
I am accused of breaking."

Note:  In one sentence that would destroy the government's
entire case.

Judge:  "No problem, Mr. Prosecutor, I'm sure that you can
provide a copy of that statute."

Prosecutor:  (Stammering and stuttering) "Um, ohh...I'm...uh...
not familiar with...uh...that part of the code."  (With that, the
Prosecutor lost his business like composure and the case was concluded. The prosecutor was ordered to find someone who
knew which statute defined the offense.)

Hauert's attorney then requested a Bill of Particulars, defining
the specific offense statute that created the liability for Hauert
to pay the income tax and file a 1040 Tax Return.  A Bill of
Particulars is a written statement of the SPECIFIC CHARGES
against the defendant.  This switched the burden of proof back
to the government to provide such a statute.  After an extended
period of time, the prosecution still could not supply the court
with the offense statute or regulation that made Tom Hauert
(or any American Citizen) the person made liable to pay the
S.1 graduated Income Tax (because no such statute exists).

Hauert, therefore, filed for and was granted a dismissal!

*****************************************************************
No law compels a work eligible man or woman to submit a form
W-4 or W-9 (or their equivalent) nor disclose an SSN as a
condition of being hired or keeping ones job. With the exception
of an order from a court of competent jurisdiction issued by a
duly qualified judge, no amounts can be lawfully taken from
ones pay (for taxes, fees or other charges) without the worker's
explicit, knowing, voluntary, written consent.
http://www.preferredservices.org/NonconsentualTaking.html

For more information about the truth of the I.R. Code -
"Just the Facts" go to: http://www.save-a-patriot.org/

From: "Automailer - freedomabovefortune.com"
<automailer@freedomabovefortune.com>
To: <Charles Bruce>; "Stewart" <charles@christiancommonlaw-gov.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 8:09 PM
Subject: How Many IRS Agents Does It Take To Commit Fraud?


Freedom Above Fortune News

Dear Friends:

David Cay Johnston of the New York Times authored an article regarding  a
couple of really "swell" attorneys who worked for the IRS.  Mr. Johnston
reported on a federal court ruling that these attorneys defrauded the U.S.
Courts so that the I.R.S. could win 1,300 tax shelter cases.  I am sharing
the article that was recently shared with me.  Please see below.

Consider This: If only 2 IRS attorneys are capable of defrauding people in
1,300 different tax cases, what rational person would find it hard to
believe that the IRS, an agency of 100,000 strong and  possessing the
unparalleled power to economically destroy anyone it chooses, is capable of
defrauding an entire nation?

***************************************************************
2 Ex-I.R.S. Lawyers' Licenses Suspended for Misconduct
The New York Times
By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
Published: August 21, 2004


The law licenses of two former Internal Revenue Service (income tax) lawyers
have been suspended for two years after a federal court ruling last year
that they defrauded the U.S. Courts so that the I.R.S. could win 1,300 tax
shelter cases.

W. Kenneth McWade was suspended by the Oregon Supreme Court in an order
dated Aug. 10 and released yesterday by the Oregon State Bar.

Four months ago Arkansas officials suspended the license of William A. Sims.

The United States Tax Court has also suspended both lawyers for two years,
and the I.R.S. director of practice has suspended them indefinitely.

The suspensions followed complaints brought by Michael Louis Minns, a
Houston lawyer who represented 124 of the tax shelter buyers, most of them
airline pilots. One buyer is seeking a $6 million refund.

The Federal Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco found in
January 2003 that the lawyers had defrauded the court by making a corrupt
deal with a few of the pilots who bought tax shelters in the 1970's and
1980's. Under the deal, no IRS tax-collection actions would be taken in
regard to their tax shelters of these pilots in return for false testimony
that would hurt the other pilots.

The U.S. Court called this "extreme misconduct", and asked why the I.R.S.
had not disciplined the IRS lawyers, each of whom was also paid a $1,000
bonus for their work on the cases.

Mr. Minns then asked the I.R.S. in which state each IRS attorney was
licensed, so that he could seek their disbarment. The I.R.S. refused to give
the information, saying disclosure of their law licenses would violate their
confidentiality.

In fighting the suspension, the two IRS lawyers filed papers contending that
they had acted properly.

IRS attorney Mr. McWade, reached at home in Hawaii, said, "I guess the court
has decided that Oregon lawyers are not entitled to due process."  IRS
attorney Mr. Sims, did not respond to voice mail and e-mail messages.

The two men (attorneys) left the I.R.S. after their conduct came under
public scrutiny.

**************************************************************
******************************************************************

-For those who have received this message as a forward from someone else,
you can sign up to receive these messages directly by visiting
www.freedomabovefortune.com and clicking on "Mailing List".

-For those who are unfamiliar with what has transpired to date in this case,
please visit www.freedomabovefortune.com and click on "IRS LOCKOUT UPDATE"
or visit www.joebanister.blogspot.com .   You can also find archives of
informative radio shows at www.hearliberty.com .

-My sincere thanks to those who have prayed for the success of our efforts
and contributed to my defense fund. Your continued financial support is
enabling me to illustrate, in detail and in a very public manner, that the
IRS does not prevail against citizens because the agency adheres to the rule
of law, but that the IRS prevails against citizens because the agency
ignores the law, twists the meaning of the law, and overwhelms the citizen
with economic and legal burdens.  In a school yard, such tactics are called
"BULLYING".  In a government setting, such tactics are called "TYRANNY".
This effort is the equivalent of ganging up on the bully and sending him to
reform school where he belongs.
******************************************************************

Kind Regards,

Joseph R. (Joe) Banister, C.P.A.
Former IRS Criminal Investigation Division Special Agent
www.freedomabovefortune.com

--------------------------------------------------------
You are receiving this e-mail because you asked to be informed of updates to
the Freedom Above Fortune website and Mr. Banister's speaking schedule.  If
you no longer wish to receive these notifications you may unsubscribe by
going to http://www.freedomabovefortune.com/mailingList/   and selecting the
'unsubscribe' option.
--------------------------------------------------------

 

Subject: NEW LAWSUIT PARALYZES THE IRS
Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 00:52:50 -0500
From: Bill Utterback <BUtterb@connecti.com
To: BUtterb@connecti.com

from:  http://www.sightings.com/general/suit.htm

Major Lawsuit Filed Against IRS In US District Court In Oregon

             NEW LAWSUIT PARALYZES THE IRS

             If you'd like to get the IRS off your back, please take a
             few moments to read the enclosed lawsuit, which was
             recently filed in Federal District Court. The information it
             contains is a matter of public record and is provided to
             you free of charge. What you are about to read will
             shock you and could dramatically change your life . . .


             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
             DISTRICT OF OREGON

             CASE NUMBER: CV 00-293-KI STEVEN M.
             BERESFORD, Ph.D., Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL
             REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES
             GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE
             TREASURY, Defendant.

             COMPLAINT FOR REFUND OF TAXES,
             PENALTIES AND INTEREST. REQUEST FOR
             PERMANENT INJUNCTION. DEMAND FOR JURY
             TRIAL.

             INTRODUCTION

             1. Plaintiff alleges that he is a British citizen who has
             been a resident alien in the US since 1987. Soon after
             taking residence in the US, it came to his attention that
             the American income tax system is based upon voluntary
             compliance. Plaintiff believes that he cannot be legally
             compelled to obey any law that is voluntary, and that he
             therefore has no legal obligation to file or pay income
             taxes.

             2. At the beginning of 1996, plaintiff received a letter
             from defendant requesting payment of overdue income
             taxes for 1987, 1988, 1989. Plaintiff responded by
             writing to defendant stating that since the income tax
             system is based on voluntary compliance, he had
             voluntarily chosen not to comply.

             3. During the next year or so, plaintiff contacted the IRS
             offices in Portland and Seattle by telephone and certified
             mail on numerous occasions asking for an explanation of
             the term `voluntary compliance' so that he could
             determine his legal liability and comply with the law if
             required to do so.

             4. Defendant ignored these requests and issued an
             involuntary federal tax lien against him on 7/12/96 for the
             sum of $7,256.80. Plaintiff then filed an appeal of federal
             tax lien on 8/9/96 and again on 9/3/97 with the IRS
             offices in Portland and Seattle. These appeals were also
             ignored.

             5. On 2/5/98, defendant sent plaintiff a notice of intent to
             levy. On 3/3/98 and on 4/1/98 the IRS office in Portland
             finally notified plaintiff that his appeal had been
             disallowed, more than 18 months after he originally filed
             it.

             6. Plaintiff then wrote to the IRS office in Portland on
             2/15/99, 4/7/99, and 6/16/99 requesting a due process
             hearing. Defendant failed to schedule a hearing and the
             sum of $14,609.97 was subsequently withheld from the
             sale of plaintiff's home at 701 North Winchell street,
             Portland on 10/14/99 under protest in satisfaction of the
             lien. Finally, on 1/3/00 defendant notified plaintiff that his
             request for a due process hearing had been denied.

             POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

             7. According to the IRS Mission Statement, the Federal
             Tax Regulations, the Internal Revenue Manual, the US
             Supreme Court, and expert testimony given before
             Congress, the tax system is based on voluntary
             compliance:

             8. a) "The mission of the Service is to encourage and
             achieve the highest possible degree of voluntary
             compliance with the tax laws and regulations and to
             maintain the highest degree of public confidence in the
             integrity and efficiency of the Service." Federal Register,
             Volume 39, #62 (11572), March 29, 1974.

             9. b) "The purpose of publishing revenue rulings and
             revenue procedures in the Internal Revenue Bulletin is to
             promote correct and uniform application of the tax laws
             by Internal Revenue Service employees and to assist
             taxpayers in attaining maximum voluntary compliance."
             Federal Tax Regulations, Section 601.601.

             10. c) "The tax system is based on voluntary
             compliance." Federal Tax Regulations, Section 601.602.

             11. d) "Taxpayers in the United States assess their tax
             liabilities against themselves and pay them voluntarily.
             This system of assessment and payment is based on the
             principle of voluntary compliance." Internal Revenue
             Manual, Section 20:123 (7/15/96).

             12. e) "Of course, the Government can collect the tax
             from a District Court suitor by exercising its power of
             distraint ~ if he does not split his action ~ but we cannot
             believe that compelling resort to this extraordinary
             measure is either wise or in accord with congressional
             intent. Our system of taxation is based upon voluntary
             assessment and payment, not upon distraint." US
             Supreme Court, Flora v. United States, 362 US 179, 80
             S.Ct. 630 (1960).

             13. f) "Let me point this out now. Your income tax is
             100 percent voluntary tax, and your liquor tax is 100
             percent enforced tax. Now the situation is as different as
             day and night. Consequently, your same rules just will
             not apply." Testimony of Dwight E. Avis, Head of the
             Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division of the Bureau of
             Internal Revenue, before the House Ways and Means
             Committee on Restructuring the IRS (83rd Congress,
             1953).

             14. Neither the Federal Tax Regulations nor the Internal
             Revenue Code define the term `voluntary compliance'.
             Hence plaintiff relies on the definitions of `voluntary'
             given in Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S. 92: 1029, 1030,
             1031):

             15. "The word `voluntary', which connotes an
             agreement, implies willingness, volition, and intent. It
             suggests a freedom of choice and refers to the doing of
             something which a person is free to do or not to do, as he
             so decides.

             Although for legal purposes the word `voluntary' is
             considered to be so simple and in such general use that it
             need not be defined, it has been defined variously as
             meaning acting by choice, acting of one's self, without
             compulsion, or without being influenced by another;
             acting with willingness; done by design or intention;
             purposed; intended; done of his or its own accord; done
             of or due to one's own accord or free choice; produced
             by an act of choice; proceeding from the will or from
             one's own choice or full consent.

             `Voluntary' is further defined as meaning free; willing;
             not accidental; spontaneous; proceeding from the free
             and unrestrained will of the person; proceeding from the
             spontaneous operation of the party's own mind, free
             from influence of any extraneous disturbing cause; of
             one's own will without being moved, influenced, or
             impelled by others; unconstrained by external
             interference, influence, or force; unimpelled by another's
             influence; not compelled, prompted, persuaded, or
             suggested by another; acting without constraint by
             extraneous force; without compulsion.

             In its legal aspect, and as commonly used in law, the
             word `voluntary' is defined as meaning gratuitous;
             without valuable consideration; acting, or done, of one's
             own free will without valuable consideration; acting, or
             done, without any present legal obligation to do the thing
             done."

             SUMMARY OF MATERIAL FACTS

             16. According to the IRS Mission Statement, the income
             tax system is based on voluntary compliance.

             17. According to the Federal Tax Regulations (sections
             601.601 and 601.602) the income tax system is based on
             voluntary compliance.

             18. The Internal Revenue Manual (section 20:123)
             explicitly states that the payment of income tax is
             voluntary.

             19. The US Supreme Court has ruled in Flora v. United
             States (supra) that the income tax system is based upon
             voluntary payment, not upon distraint.

             20. Dwight E. Avis, Head of the Alcohol and Tobacco
             Tax Division of the IRS, testified before Congress that
             income tax is 100 percent voluntary.

             21. According to Corpus Juris Secundum (supra), various
             courts have ruled that the meaning of the word
             `voluntary' includes: "the doing of something which a
             person is free to do or not to do; acting without
             compulsion; acting without constraint by external
             interference, influence, or force; acting without any
             present legal obligation to do the thing done."

             22. Plaintiff did not voluntarily pay income taxes for the
             years 1987, 1988, 1989.

             23. In response to defendant's request for payment of
             taxes for the years 1987, 1988, 1989, plaintiff repeatedly
             asked defendant to explain the meaning of the term
             `voluntary compliance', but defendant repeatedly failed to
             do so.

             24. Defendant issued an involuntary federal tax lien
             against plaintiff on 7/12/96 for the sum of $7,256.80. In
             response, plaintiff filed an appeal of federal tax lien on
             8/9/96 and again on 9/3/97, which defendant disallowed
             on 3/3/98. Plaintiff then requested a due process hearing
             on 2/15/99, 4/7/99, and 6/16/99, which defendant denied
             on 1/3/00.

             25. Defendant compelled the sum of $14,609.97 to be
             withheld from the sale of plaintiff's home on 10/14/99
             under protest by means of the above-mentioned
             involuntary federal tax lien.

             26. Plaintiff has exhausted the administrative remedies
             available to him by defendant, was at all material times
             referred to herein a resident of the State of Oregon, has
             his principle place of business in the State of Oregon, and
             relies on 28 U.S.C. Section 1346 (a)(1) and Section 1391
             (b) as giving the District Court of the State of Oregon
             jurisdiction in this matter.

             ARGUMENT

             27. Plaintiff argues that according to the true and correct
             usage of the word `voluntary' in standard English and in
             legal English (as outlined in Corpus Juris Secundum), he
             cannot ~ by definition ~ be forced or compelled to do
             something that is voluntary, such as complying with a
             voluntary law.

             28. Plaintiff argues that since the law clearly and
             unambiguously states that the payment of income tax is
             voluntary, defendant cannot lawfully force or compel him
             to pay income tax. Plaintiff argues that his position is
             supported by Tietjen v. Heberlein, 171 P. 928, 54 Mont.
             486; Akio Kuwahara v. Acheson, D.C. Cal., 96 F. Supp.
             38, 42; Brown v. State, 135 S.E. 765, 766, 36 Ga. App.
             84; Coker v State, 33 S.E. 2d 171, 174, 199 Ga. 20;
             Perryman v. State, 12 S.E. 2d 288, 391, 63 Ga. App.
             819; in which the courts ruled that a voluntary action is
             one that is done without compulsion or external force.

             29. Plaintiff argues that he has the freedom of choice to
             pay or not to pay income tax without any legal obligation
             toward defendant, and that his position is supported by
             Touli v. Santa Cruz County Title Co., 67 P.2d 404, 406,
             20 Cal. App. 2d 495, in which the court ruled that a
             voluntary action is one that is done without any legal
             obligation to do the thing done.

             30. Plaintiff argues that according to the IRS Mission
             Statement, the Federal Tax Regulations, the Internal
             Revenue Manual, the US Supreme Court, and the
             testimony of Dwight Avis before the House Ways and
             Means Committee, voluntary compliance forms the
             foundation of the entire income tax system and is not a
             subordinate or conditional regulation.

             31. Plaintiff argues that section 6321 of the Internal
             Revenue Code, which lays out the rule concerning
             federal tax liens, does not form the foundation of the
             income tax system and is therefore subordinate to and
             conditional upon the principle of voluntary compliance,
             which always takes precedence over it.

             32. Plaintiff argues that although defendant has the legal
             right to issue a federal tax lien under section 6321, such a
             lien must be a voluntary lien in order to conform to the
             principle of voluntary compliance, and that defendant
             does not have the legal right to issue an involuntary
             federal tax lien.

             33. Plaintiff argues that the involuntary federal tax lien
             issued against him by defendant under section 6321 of
             the Internal Revenue Code violated the principle of
             voluntary compliance and was erroneous and unlawful.

             34. Plaintiff argues that defendant acted erroneously and
             unlawfully by compelling money to be withheld from the
             sale of his home by means of an involuntary federal tax
             lien, because the involuntary compliance thus obtained
             violated the principle of voluntary compliance.

             35. Plaintiff argues that since the payment of income tax
             is voluntary, he has never had any legal or financial
             obligation toward defendant and has never owed
             defendant anything, and that any and all claims against
             him by defendant are false and without merit.

             CONCLUSION

             36. The law clearly and unambiguously states that the
             payment of income taxes is voluntary, as codified in the
             IRS Mission Statement and in Sections 601.601 and
             601.602 of the Federal Tax Regulations, and affirmed by
             Section 20:123 of the Internal Revenue Manual, by the
             US Supreme Court in Flora v. US, and by the expert
             testimony of Dwight E. Avis before Congress.

             37. The principle of voluntary compliance forms the
             foundation of the entire income tax system, and is not a
             subordinate or conditional regulation.

             38. Section 6321 of the Internal Revenue Code, which
             lays out the rule concerning federal tax liens, does not
             form the foundation of the income tax system and is
             therefore subordinate to and conditional upon the
             principle of voluntary compliance, which always takes
             precedence over it.

             39. Defendant does not have the legal right to issue an
             involuntary federal tax lien under section 6321 of the
             Internal Revenue Code, because such a lien violates the
             principle of voluntary compliance. Since the law clearly
             states that the payment of income taxes is voluntary,
             defendant acted erroneously and unlawfully by
             compelling the sum of $14,609.97 to be withheld from
             the sale of plaintiff's home on 10/14/99 under protest by
             means of an involuntary federal tax lien.

             40. According to the true and correct usage of the word
             `voluntary' in standard English and in legal English,
             plaintiff cannot be compelled to do something that is
             voluntary, such as the payment of income tax ~ which is
             voluntary. By compelling plaintiff to pay income tax by
             means of an involuntary federal tax lien, defendant
             violated plaintiff's intrinsic right to freedom of choice in
             the matter without compulsion or legal obligation.

             THEREFORE

             Plaintiff prays that the Court will uphold the true and
             correct usage of the word `voluntary', and will uphold his
             intrinsic legal right under the principle of voluntary
             compliance to exercise freedom of choice to comply or
             not to comply with the income tax laws without
             compulsion or legal obligation, and prays for judgment
             against defendant as follows:

             a) That the Court will order defendant to refund to
             plaintiff the sum of $14,609.97 plus interest.

             b) That the Court will order defendant to pay plaintiff
             administrative and litigation costs arising from the
             prosecution of this lawsuit in the sum of $11,150.

             c) That in view of plaintiff's decision not to voluntarily
             comply with the income tax system, the Court will issue a
             permanent injunction forbidding defendant from
             contacting him against his wishes and from directly or
             indirectly interfering in any other aspect of his life.

             Steven M. Beresford, Ph.D. (Plaintiff in propria persona)
             2/28/00


             A PERSONAL MESSAGE TO YOU FROM STEVEN
             BERESFORD

             As a result of this potentially devastating lawsuit, which
             was written by myself, the IRS is being represented in
             court by Janet Reno and the Justice Department. In order
             to win, I need to hire a good attorney to help me navigate
             the legal minefield, so I'm asking for your support.

             If you'd like to help me beat the IRS, please mail your
             donation to: The Steven Beresford Defense Fund, c/o
             Steven Beresford, 18803 SE 18th Street, Vancouver,
             WA 98683. Whether you send $10 or $1,000, your help
             could force the IRS to its knees and make them beg for
             your tax dollars in future. This is an important lawsuit
             that could end the tyranny of the IRS once and for all.
             But I sincerely need your support.

             Please forward this e-mail to as many people as possible.
             The more people who know the truth about voluntary
             compliance, the less power the IRS will have over the
             American public. Time is of the essence. Janet Reno is
             on the warpath, so please do it now, before you get
             sidetracked and forget. Thank you for your time and
             cooperation.

             Steven Beresford

             P.S. If you want to verify this lawsuit, feel free to
             contact Jian Grant (202-307-6422) who is the
             Department of Justice attorney.

*******************************************************************

From: Beaver Cole <mailto:bcole@longview.net>  
To: Wjpbr@aol.com <mailto:Wjpbr@aol.com>  ; t r u t h o u t <mailto:postman@truthout.org>  ; Info at PAC <mailto:info@pacinlaw.org>  ; American Patriot Friends Network <mailto:APFN@apfn.org>  
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:38 PM
Subject: FW: IRS AGENT UNCOVERS AGENTS!

Folks,

This came through today and thought I should share with the list.
There seems to be a information revolution going on thanks to the Internet.
We are seeing changes even in our main stream media to tell the truth coming
to light.
Money seems to be and has been the way in this world to get power and
control over other people`s lifes. My faith in God`s wisdom tells me that he
knows everything anyway.
In my opinion, our world is in a healing and truth trend as I typ and we
should pray for IRS agents...

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

  I was contacted by an ex employee of the IRS that wants to remain unknown
and he told me:

1.That there now is more undercover IRS agents than there ever were and that
they have infiltrated Patriot Groups, are on most Patriot Internet List, and
are the ones that volunteer to help everyone so their cover is good.
 2. That many major Law firms and many C.P.A.'s are now 10 percenters and
are turning clients in to the IRS without the Firm knowing about it and They
are getting paid 10% by sending their check to their home addresses.
 They snoop through other's files (on week ends when no one is around-check
out the files-& photo and make copies of incriminating information.
 3. Almost all large law firms that specialise in Taxation NOW has a Ten
Percenter working undercover as do all large C.P.A. Firms that do tax work.
 4. Most Tax Fighter Groups have two undercover agents (so they can cover
each others backs) and usually set things up so they can ask all members to
sign a petition (with their names and addresses) for a good cause, (but the
IRS gets a copy and then has a HIT LIST.)
 5. Some of the undercover agents are actually in charge of the Tax Protest
Group and the least suspected by the membershp.
 6. The IRS saves more money, and catches more tax protestors by using
undercover agents than they do using regular agents plus the agents get a
good size raise in pay for being undercover and a member of a tax protest
group.
 7. That our government considers the Tax Protest Movement more dangerous to
them than the Terrorists or any other group since they are more intelligent,
hard working and usually unknown by their neighbors, fellow workers, etc.
 8. That the government is more concerned about a General Tax Revolt than
another bombing of a building or other terrorist acts.
 9. Now that you have been warned, BE CAREFUL, &  KEEP A LOW PROFILE.
 BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU TELL OTHERS ABOUT YOUR ASSETS, AND ACTIVITIES.
 ETC.
 The undercover agent is usually the one that agrees with you and wants to
be your friend.
 He will volunteer for all the tough jobs such as sending out the newsletter
(he gets the mailing list)
 pickig up people, giving them rides, and will always attend all meetings.
He will tap all phones if he can, and plant mikes and carry a voice
activated small tape recorder with him.
 He will appear like a successful business man, and dress nice with nice
manners. He will agree with everybody and volunteer to help everybody.

THE WHOLE THING IS A
PACK OF LIES.

This is the REAL MATRIX

1.) The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It
is an Agency of the IMF. (Diversified Metal Products
v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law
94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization
Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)

2.) The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law
Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816)

3.) The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921.
(41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654)

4.) The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF.
(Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg. 113, 22
U.S.C. 285-288)

5.) The United States does not have any
employees because there is no longer a United States.
No more reorganization. After over 200 years of
operating under bankruptcy it’s finally over.
(Executive Order 12803) Do not personate one of the
creditors or shareholders or you will go to Prison.18
U.S.C.914

6.) The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the
other alphabet gangs were never part of the United
States government. Even though the "US Government"
held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V.
Strang , 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d, 1239)

7.) The UN through the IMF issues Social
Security Numbers. The Application for a Social
Security Number is the SS5 form. The Department of the
Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 not the Social Security
Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who or
what publishes them, the earlier SS5 forms state that
they are Department of the Treasury forms. You can get
a copy of the SS5 you filled out by sending form
SSA-L996 to the SS Administration. (20 CFR chapter
111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2) Read the cites
above)

8.) There are no Judicial courts in America and
there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce
Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce
Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v.
PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)

9.) There have not been any Judges in America
since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC
v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat.
138-178)

10.) According to the GATT you must have a Social
Security number. House Report (103-826)

11.) We have One World Government, One World Law
and a One World Monetary System.

12.) The UN is a One World Super Government.

13.) No one on this planet has ever been free!!.
This planet is a Slave Colony. There has always been
One World Government. It is just that now it is much
better organized and has changed its name as of 1945
to the United Nations.

14.) New York City is defined in the Federal
Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani
stated on C-Span that "New York City was the capital
of the World" and he was correct. (20 CFR chapter 111,
subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2)

15.) Social Security is not insurance or a
contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v.
Davis 301 US 619, Steward Co. V. Davis 301 US 548.)

16.) Your Social Security check comes directly from
the IMF, which is an Agency of the UN. (Look at it if
you receive one. It should have written on the top
left United States Treasury.)

17.) You own no property, slaves can't own
property. Read the Deed to the property that you think
is yours. You are listed as a Tenant. (Senate Document
43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)

18.) The most powerful court in America is not the
United States Supreme Court but the Supreme Court of
Pennsylvania. (42 Pa.C.S.A. 502)

19.) The Revolutionary War was a fraud. See (22, 23
and 24)

20.) The King of England financially backed both
sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at Versailles
July 16, 1782, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)

21.) You can not use the Constitution to defend
yourself because you are not a party to it. (Padelford
Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of The City of
Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)

22.) America is a British Colony. (THE UNITED
STATES IS A CORPORATION, NOT A LAND MASS AND IT
EXISTED BEFORE THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND THE BRITISH
TROOPS DID NOT LEAVE UNTIL 1796.) Respublica v. Sweers
1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The
Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c. V. New Haven 8
Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication
6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.)

23.) Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of
1213)

24.) The Pope can abolish any law in the United
States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1 53-54)

25.) A 1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain.
(IRS Publication 6209)

26.) The Pope claims to own the entire planet
through the laws of conquest and discovery. (Papal
Bulls of 1455 and 1493)

27.) The Pope has ordered the genocide and
enslavement of millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455
and 1493)

28.) The Popes laws are obligatory on everyone.
(Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4.
Prati, 1844)(Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44)

29.) We are slaves and own absolutely nothing not
even what we think are our children.(Tillman v.
Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten 154 N.E.
146, Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session,
Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)

30.) Military Dictator George Washington divided
the States (Estates) into Districts. (Messages and
papers of the Presidents Vo 1, pg 99. Websters 1828
dictionary for definition of Estate.)

31.) " The People" does not include you and me.
(Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore. 32 U.S.
243)

32.) The United States Government was not founded
upon Christianity. (Treaty of Tripoli 8 Stat 154.)

33.) It is not the duty of the police to protect
you !. Their job is to protect the Corporation and
arrest code breakers. Sapp v. Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd.
363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia, 477 F.Supp. 1262,
Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247.

34.) Everything in the "United States" is For Sale:
roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, water, prisons
airports etc. I wonder who bought Klamath Lake? Did
anyone take the time to check? (Executive Order 12803)


35.) We are Human capital. (Executive Order 13037)


36.) The UN has financed the operations of the
United States government for over 50 years and now
owns every man, women and child in America. The UN
also holds all of the Land in America in Fee Simple.

37.) The good news is we don't have to fulfill
"our" fictitious obligations. You can discharge a
fictitious obligation with another's fictitious
obligation.

38.) The depression and World War II were a total
farce. The United States and various other companies
were making loans to others all over the World during
the Depression. The building of Germanys
infrastructure in the 1930's including the Railroads
was financed by the United States. That way those who
call themselves "Kings," "Prime Ministers," and
"Furor."etc could sit back and play a game of chess
using real people. Think of all of the Americans,
Germans etc. who gave their lives thinking they were
defending their Countries, which didn't even exist.
The millions of innocent people who died for nothing.
Isn't it obvious why Switzerland is never involved in
these fiascoes? That is where the "Bank of
International Settlements" is located. Wars are
manufactured to keep your eye off the ball. You have
to have an enemy to keep the illusion of Government"
in place.

39.) The "United States" did not declare
Independence from Great Britian or King George.

40.) Guess who owns the UN?

 

 

Candice Lightner

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition


























Modified Tuesday, November 02, 2010

Copyright @ 2010 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party